Quote from
Viper on February 28, 2022, 5:06 pm
So now that the state dual tournament is over its obvious that there needs to be a change in the way the "power points" are tallied. This was very evident in the B duals where #3 Kingsbury County got beat out to a no-placement. It gives validation to the people who argued pre-tournament that MCM or Custer should have been there instead, and schools like Bon Homme/Scotland or Philip should have probably been higher.
The A's didn't have as much controversy (about this) but obviously Sturgis was above their 7 seed somewhere.
I'd love to get some points of view on how to make the ranking system better so teams don't feel like they got the shaft on not being included. I'm still fuzzy on the current system but it needs work
So now that the state dual tournament is over its obvious that there needs to be a change in the way the "power points" are tallied. This was very evident in the B duals where #3 Kingsbury County got beat out to a no-placement. It gives validation to the people who argued pre-tournament that MCM or Custer should have been there instead, and schools like Bon Homme/Scotland or Philip should have probably been higher.
The A's didn't have as much controversy (about this) but obviously Sturgis was above their 7 seed somewhere.
I'd love to get some points of view on how to make the ranking system better so teams don't feel like they got the shaft on not being included. I'm still fuzzy on the current system but it needs work
TJ and Squirrel83 have reacted to this post.
